Professional Publications, Inc. FERC Ethics 18-1 FE Exam Information The ethics questions test students on reading comprehension and elementary logic. •Assumptions are necessary since exam problems may not give complete information. •Answers that require large leaps in logic are almost always wrong. Fundamentals in Engineering (FE) Exam AKA Engineer-in-Training (EIT) Exam. Be licensed in order to practice. • “The best time to take the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam is while you are enrolled in college, typically the last semester of your final year. Cardiris 5 cracks. CardIRIS 3.9.5 Serial Number Keygen for All Versions Find Serial Number notice: CardIRIS serial number, CardIRIS all version keygen, CardIRIS activation key, crack - may give false results or no results in search terms. Many downloads like Cardiris Pro 5 may also include a serial number, cd key or keygen. If this is the case then it's usually included in the full crack download archive itself. If you are still having trouble finding Cardiris Pro 5 after simplifying your search term then we highly recommend using the alternative full download sites (linked above). ![]() March 2015 The Evolution of the FE The Fundamentals of Engineering Exam is adapting to curricula changes and new technology while remaining a critical step in the licensure process. BY EVA KAPLAN-LEISERSON S ince it was first offered nationally in 1965, the FE exam has served as the second stop in the engineering licensure process, after earning an accredited degree. It remains the only national exam designed to test candidates on knowledge and skills gained in college engineering programs. Over the years, the exam has changed to better reflect academic curricula and industry needs, as well as to update testing practices. A little over a year ago, the exam transitioned to computer-based testing, which has increased flexibility for test-takers while deterring cheaters and improving security of exam packets. Concurrent adjustments to content have ensured the discipline-specific FEs are more closely aligned with curricula. A Series of Changes If you sat for the FE exam prior to 1996, you took the same exam as all of your fellow test-takers nationwide. But that year, the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) added an afternoon portion focused on the disciplines: civil, mechanical, electrical, industrial, chemical, or general (later called “other disciplines”). Environmental engineering joined the list in 2002. In this format, the morning included general engineering knowledge, such as math or ethics; the afternoon concentrated on specialized knowledge—for example, structural analysis for civil engineers. Says NCEES Chief Operating Officer and NSPE member Davy McDowell, P.E., “the exam had always been really centered on the student who was in the senior year of the engineering program, so it seemed to be a natural fit to test them on things that they would experience in their entire career in school.” Because the FE is a nationally normed exam, over the years institutions have been able to use exam results to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their programs, particularly for ABET accreditation (see sidebar). The move to a discipline-specific format also allowed schools to gain more information about their content beyond what was taught in freshman and sophomore years. The change was made with such assessment in mind, says McDowell. The council and its leadership “saw the exam could have a dual purpose.” The latest pencil-and-paper version of the FE took eight hours and comprised 180 questions. It was offered twice a year, in October and April. Test takers would typically need to wait six to eight weeks for their results. The Move to Computer In the late 1990s, NCEES formed a task force to examine transitioning its exams to computer-based testing (CBT). But, according to McDowell, student focus groups highlighted the need to further grow awareness of engineering licensure and the FE exam before making major changes to the test. The organization spent time talking to students about the importance of licensure and promoting the use of the FE exam as an ABET outcomes assessment tool. Concurrently, NCEES began to work on exam questions to ensure they would work for the eventual move to CBT. From 2007 to 2013, NCEES grew the number of FE examinees from 48,000 to 56,000. Install qmail on centos 7 kernel boot windows 10. Finally, in 2010, NCEES voted at its annual meeting to transition to a computer-based format. Grant Crawford, P.E., professor of mechanical engineering at Quinnipiac University in Connecticut, served as vice chair of the FE exam committee from 2010–12 and chair from 2012–14. He acted as the “conduit” between council staff and the roughly 80 volunteers helping to convert the exam. The FE for Outcomes Assessment Since the 1990s, NCEES has provided accredited engineering programs with FE exam reports that summarize results by topic and offer national comparisons. Programs can use the information to assess student strengths and weaknesses and evaluate outcomes. David Whitman, P.E., engineering education professor at the University of Wyoming, has coauthored NCEES whitepapers on outcomes assessment and conducts presentations on the topic. He explains that the reports are a great assessment tool because they offer apples-to-apples comparisons and “hard and fast numbers” that can show ABET why an institution is making changes. The University of Wyoming is one of many schools that require students to take the FE, in order to gather the data, but not to pass it. The school has made changes to programs based on the reports—for instance, after a fairly significant drop in the scores of one subject over a year and a half, an instructor was returned to a course who had been removed. Scores went back up. NSPE member Scott Sabol, P.E., a professor in the architectural and building engineering technology department at Vermont Tech, notes that his department uses results not just to determine what to change but also what not to change, based on what students do well in. Brian Swenty, P.E., chair of the mechanical and civil engineering department at the University of Evansville in Indiana, explains that although his department also uses other assessment methods, the FE “is the key, the lynchpin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |